Write a 500-word essay on this topic. Describe family government in terms of the five institutional characteristics: sovereignty, hierarchy (authority), law, sanctions, and succession. Offer an opinion on what the source of the family's sovereignty is.
Review, Lesson 8: separate Jurisdictions
- 1 Corinthians 6
- the state is an inferior jurisdiction
- the church must grow in social authority
- the church must not compromise its authority by merging with the state
- the church should accomplish this by practicing jurisdiction
- Conclusions:
- Governments have separate jurisdictions
- These Jurisdictions have separate courts
- The state is not the sole jurisdiction
Family jurisdiction
- Families are established by judicially binding vows
- These vows establish mutual responsibilities
- these vows extend to minor children
- The vows establish a government with all the rights of a government
- A government has these characteristics
- Sovereignty
- Hierarchy
- Laws
- Sanctions
- Succession
- A government possesses the right to exclude
- The husband and the wife are exclusively bonded
- the husband is sovereign
- the family has a patriarchal structure of authority
- The children are under parental authority
- Law is defined by parents
- Parents impose sanctions
- The sons succeed their father
- A government has immunity from invasion
- the state did not create the family
- Marriage is a contract between husband and wife before God
- The state, therefore, has no rights in the contract or its products
- children are products of the family union, property of parents
- The state does not establish ethics
- The state does not impose sanctions
- The State has no right to control children or parents
- therefore it must not
- It does
- this constitutes a moral violation
- Education is never morally neutral
- Requires truth and falsehood
- there must be standards of truth and falsehood
- teachers must impose these standards
- therefore they favor the order they impose
- Fair and unfair
- what is fair to the child?
- someone has to make this decision
- nobody but the parent has the property right to make a decision apart from God
- the state is Godless
- therefore the state violates property rights
- Right and Wrong
- There have to be standards of right and wrong
- the students have to be taught how to evaluate events to be truly educated
- nobody but the parents have the right to impose those ideas on the children
- Success and failure
- there are valid and invalid indicators of success
- someone must determine these subjectively
- the stage has no right to determine questions of value for others and impose it on them
- therefore they violate the parent's rights by doing so
- Hope and Futility
- The state chooses not to discriminate in this regard, preferring universal positive sanction
- this is harmful to the student for the above reasons
- it also encourages a lack of direction and value
- this is a form of sabotage to the student
- a perversion of hope for political gain
- Motives
- Parents: Adults to inherit, prosper, and carry on the legacy
- State: Adult children to pay taxes and defend it's power loyally
- God: Faithful citizens in working families
- Church: Faithful believers and strong families to support it
- Self: A strong family to support you and a useful education
- Parents: Adulty children who advance
- State: Adult children who obey
- Parents: Adults who can think to avoid harmful schemes
- State: Servants who believe in propaganda
- Parents: Adults who create wealth
- State: Adult children who contribute wealth
- Parents: The legacy of values
- State: Values useful to the state
- Parents: Methods valuable and useful to them
- State: Methods valuable to the bureaucracy
- Parents: Results judged by their standards for evaluation
- State: results judged by the bureaucracy for uniformity
- He who pays the piper calls the tune
- Parents pay for the tune they like best
- The state wants to pay in order to call the tune
- Parents hire and fire according to their values
- The state hires and fires according to its values
- The present is the extension of the past
- not an extension of superstitious ritual
- A moral and confessional extension
- Moral improvement is possible
- The Future is more important than the past or present
- Economic improvement is possible
Conclusions
- A family is a legitimate government
- The family is not an agency of the state
- The family has the right to exclude the state
- Parents have sovereignty over children
- Children inherent, not the state
- this is the natural order
- This represents a serious conflict between the state of man and the fundamental molecule of culture
No comments:
Post a Comment